Metaxotos v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Metaxotos v. State

876 So. 2d 1261, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9955, 2004 WL 1506164

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 7, 2004

DocketNo. 4D04-1881

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 876 So. 2d 1261 (Metaxotos v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Metaxotos v. State, 876 So. 2d 1261, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9955, 2004 WL 1506164 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Peter Metaxotos was convicted and sentenced for attempted first degree murder, armed burglary, and sexual battery with a [1262]*1262deadly weapon in a 1998 prosecution. In this appeal from an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief, the defendant argues that his automatic designation as a sexual predator under Florida’s Sexual Predator Act, § 775.21, Fla. Stat., without a hearing on the actual risk of future offenses he poses, violates his procedural process rights. We affirm. See Reyes v. State, 854 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). See also Frazier v. State 29 Fla. L. Weekly D369, — So.2d -, 2004 WL 221043 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb.6, 2004); Miller v. State, 861 So.2d 1283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla.2003). We certify conflict with the third district in Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

POLEN, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Peter Metaxotos was convicted and sentenced for attempted first degree murder, armed burglary, and sexual battery with a [1262]*1262deadly weapon in a 1998 prosecution. In this appeal from an order denying his motion for post-conviction relief, the defendant argues that his automatic designation as a sexual predator under Florida’s Sexual Predator Act, § 775.21, Fla. Stat., without a hearing on the actual risk of future offenses he poses, violates his procedural process rights. We affirm. See Reyes v. State, 854 So.2d 816 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). See also Frazier v. State 29 Fla. L. Weekly D369, — So.2d -, 2004 WL 221043 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb.6, 2004); Miller v. State, 861 So.2d 1283 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004); Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla.2003). We certify conflict with the third district in Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003).

POLEN, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

876 So. 2d 1261, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 9955, 2004 WL 1506164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metaxotos-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack