Metal Traders, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Metal Traders, Inc. v. United States

29 Cust. Ct. 384

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1952

DocketNo. 56896; protest 175988-K (San Francisco)

StatusPublished

This text of 29 Cust. Ct. 384 (Metal Traders, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Metal Traders, Inc. v. United States, 29 Cust. Ct. 384 (cusc 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Rao, J.

An examination of the documents received in evidence revealed that the involved merchandise contains tin, antimony, arsenic, lead, copper, nickel, iron, silver, and bismuth, whereas solder, as commercially known, does not contain copper, nickel, iron, or silver. It further appeared that the report of the examiner was not received by the collector within the time prescribed by section 515, Tariff Act of 1930, for the collector’s reconsideration of protest claims, and although the claim herein was conceded by the collector, the protest was forwarded to the court. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Rao, J.

An examination of the documents received in evidence revealed that the involved merchandise contains tin, antimony, arsenic, lead, copper, nickel, iron, silver, and bismuth, whereas solder, as commercially known, does not contain copper, nickel, iron, or silver. It further appeared that the report of the examiner was not received by the collector within the time prescribed by section 515, Tariff Act of 1930, for the collector’s reconsideration of protest claims, and although the claim herein was conceded by the collector, the protest was forwarded to the court. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 Cust. Ct. 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/metal-traders-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1952.