Messner v. Lewis

17 Tex. 519
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 Tex. 519 (Messner v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Messner v. Lewis, 17 Tex. 519 (Tex. 1856).

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

This appeal was taken from the overruling of the motion to quash the attachment. The notice of appeal refers to that ruling, and has no reference to the final judgment. It cannot be held to apply to the final judgment, thereafter rendered. The appeal bond describes the final judgment as the one appealed from ; but there is, in the record, no notice of such appeal. Notice of appeal is essential to give this Court jurisdiction of the case, on appeal. (1 Tex. R. 199; 6 Id. 76.) It is wanting in the present, case.

The judgment upon the motion to quash the attachment was an interlocutory judgment, from which an appeal does not lie : (2 Tex. R. 163, 529; 8 Id. 341.,) if it did, the bond would not sustain the appeal in this case ; for it describes, not the judgment appealed from, but a different judgment. There is a discrepancy between the judgment appealed from and the [521]*521bond, which, of itself, would be fatal to the appeal. But, because there is no notice of appeal from the final judgment, the appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

C. Holek & Co. v. Varona
63 Tex. 65 (Texas Supreme Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 Tex. 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/messner-v-lewis-tex-1856.