Messmer v. State
625 So. 2d 976, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10661, 1993 WL 424222
This text of 625 So. 2d 976 (Messmer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Messmer v. State, 625 So. 2d 976, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10661, 1993 WL 424222 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
Opinion
The state concedes that the trial court erred in failing to enter a written order revoking probation. See Clark v. State, 510 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Accordingly, we remand for entry of a written order of revocation specifying the conditions of probation violated. See Dietz v. State, 534 So.2d [977]*977808 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). Appellant need not be present.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dietz v. State
534 So. 2d 808 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Clark v. State
510 So. 2d 1202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
625 So. 2d 976, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10661, 1993 WL 424222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/messmer-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.