Messmer v. Messmer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Messmer v. Messmer

532 P.2d 806, 20 Or. App. 578, 1975 Ore. App. LEXIS 1681

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMarch 10, 1975

DocketNo. 367-496

StatusPublished

This text of 532 P.2d 806 (Messmer v. Messmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Messmer v. Messmer, 532 P.2d 806, 20 Or. App. 578, 1975 Ore. App. LEXIS 1681 (Or. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

SCHWAB, C.J.

This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court modifying the child custody and support provisions of an original divorce decree. The original decree, entered on June 8, 1971, awarded appellant-mother custody of the parties’ three minor children and required respondent-father to pay child support. The modification order transferred custody of the children to the father and required the mother to pay child support. The mother contends first that it was error to change custody of the children, and that even if a change of custody was proper it was error to order that she pay support.

The mother has remarried since the divorce decree. Suffice it to say that having reviewed the record in light of the factors enumerated in Tingen v. Tingen, 251 Or 458, 462, 446 P2d 185 (1968), we agree with the trial judge that the family situation which has existed since appellant’s remarriage has had “a most deleterious effect on the children,” and conclude that custody was correctly changed to respondent.

There was no motion for child support and no evidence that the mother had income or earning capacity. Thus, it was improper to order that she pay child support. Cf., Waymire and Waymire, 17 Or App 562, 522 P2d 1394 (1974).

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCHWAB, C.J.

This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court modifying the child custody and support provisions of an original divorce decree. The original decree, entered on June 8, 1971, awarded appellant-mother custody of the parties’ three minor children and required respondent-father to pay child support. The modification order transferred custody of the children to the father and required the mother to pay child support. The mother contends first that it was error to change custody of the children, and that even if a change of custody was proper it was error to order that she pay support.

The mother has remarried since the divorce decree. Suffice it to say that having reviewed the record in light of the factors enumerated in Tingen v. Tingen, 251 Or 458, 462, 446 P2d 185 (1968), we agree with the trial judge that the family situation which has existed since appellant’s remarriage has had “a most deleterious effect on the children,” and conclude that custody was correctly changed to respondent.

There was no motion for child support and no evidence that the mother had income or earning capacity. Thus, it was improper to order that she pay child support. Cf., Waymire and Waymire, 17 Or App 562, 522 P2d 1394 (1974).

Affirmed as modified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

532 P.2d 806, 20 Or. App. 578, 1975 Ore. App. LEXIS 1681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/messmer-v-messmer-orctapp-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack