Messlin v. Messlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Messlin v. Messlin

239 A.D. 916

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 239 A.D. 916 (Messlin v. Messlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Messlin v. Messlin, 239 A.D. 916 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The facts set forth in the moving papers filed on plaintiff's application for alimony and counsel fee do not warrant the granting of such application. We are of opinion, however, that the case should be tried during the June, 1933, term. If not disposed of during that term, the plaintiff should be allowed to renew her motion for alimony at Special Term on additional papers. The orders appealed from should be affirmed. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Townley, JJ. Orders affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The facts set forth in the moving papers filed on plaintiff's application for alimony and counsel fee do not warrant the granting of such application. We are of opinion, however, that the case should be tried during the June, 1933, term. If not disposed of during that term, the plaintiff should be allowed to renew her motion for alimony at Special Term on additional papers. The orders appealed from should be affirmed. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Townley, JJ. Orders affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 A.D. 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/messlin-v-messlin-nyappdiv-1933.