Messineo v. Kletz
This text of 10 A.D.2d 734 (Messineo v. Kletz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover on checks, the appeals are (1) from a resettled order denying appellants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution, (2) from an order denying their motion for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the complaint (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 112) and granting respondent’s cross motion to strike out the first and third defenses pleaded in appellants’ answer (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 109, subd. 6), and (3) from an order denying appellants’ motion for leave to amend their answer. Orders affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldoek, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 A.D.2d 734, 201 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/messineo-v-kletz-nyappdiv-1960.