Messina v. Staten Island University Hospital

121 A.D.3d 868, 994 N.Y.S.2d 373
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 2014
Docket2013-05977
StatusPublished

This text of 121 A.D.3d 868 (Messina v. Staten Island University Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Messina v. Staten Island University Hospital, 121 A.D.3d 868, 994 N.Y.S.2d 373 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

*869 In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Maltese, J.), dated May 7, 2013, as denied that branch of its motion which was to vacate so much of an order of the same court dated May 24, 2012, as, sua sponte, directed entry of a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against it in the sum of $900,000.

Ordered that the order dated May 7, 2013, is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to vacate so much of an order dated May 24, 2012, as, sua sponte, directed entry of a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against it in the sum of $900,000 is granted.

The Supreme Court erred in, sua sponte, directing the entry of a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant in the sum of $900,000. The Supreme Court awarded this sum to the plaintiffs based upon an alleged stipulation of settlement for past medical expenses. However, neither the plaintiffs nor the defendant requested such a judgment, and it is undisputed that there was no stipulation of settlement made in accordance with CPLR 2104 (see Diarassouba v Urban, 71 AD3d 51, 55 [2009]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should not have granted that relief sua sponte (see Martinez v Dushko, 7 AD3d 584, 585 [2004]; Tuma v Galgano, 303 AD2d 675, 676 [2003]; Bondanella v Rosenfeld, 298 AD2d 941, 943 [2002]).

Mastro, J.E, Chambers, Sgroi and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martinez v. Dushko
7 A.D.3d 584 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Diarassouba v. Urban
71 A.D.3d 51 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Bondanella v. Rosenfeld
298 A.D.2d 941 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Tuma v. Galgano
303 A.D.2d 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 A.D.3d 868, 994 N.Y.S.2d 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/messina-v-staten-island-university-hospital-nyappdiv-2014.