Messina v. EAST PENN TOWNSHIP

9 A.3d 1136, 607 Pa. 623, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2836
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 7, 2010·No. 452 MAL 2010·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

*624 (1) Whether 42 Pa.C.S. § 5571.1 precludes a procedural validity challenge brought more than two years after the effective date of the ordinance.

(2) Whether the failure to re-advertise the proposed zoning ordinance after changes were made to the zoning map prior to adoption invalidated the ordinance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Messina v. EAST PENN TOWNSHIP, 9 A.3d 1136, 607 Pa. 623, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 2836 (Pa. 2010).

9 A.3d 1136 (Messina v. EAST PENN TOWNSHIP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Messina v. East Penn Township
62 A.3d 363 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2012)
Oxford Corp. v. Zoning Hearing Board
34 A.3d 286 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)