Messina v. City of Batavia
This text of 38 A.D.2d 678 (Messina v. City of Batavia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order and judgment unanimously modified accordance with the memorandum and as modified affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Since the action is one for declaratory judgment the court should have declared the validity of the resolutions of March 9, 1970 and June 29, 1970 instead of dismissing the amended complaint (see Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N Y 2d 317, 334; Town of Pittsford v. Gallea, 25 A D 2d 479, affd. 18 N Y 2d 920; 24 Carmody-Wait 2d, New York Practice, § 147:37). (Appeal from judgment and order of Erie Special Term dismissing complaint [679]*679in declaratory judgment action.) Present — Del Vecchio, J. P., Witmer, Gabrielli, Cardamone and Henry, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 A.D.2d 678, 327 N.Y.S.2d 266, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/messina-v-city-of-batavia-nyappdiv-1971.