Messimore v. Messimore

89 A.D.3d 1547, 932 N.Y.2d 753
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 18, 2011·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum:

Petitioner father commenced this proceeding seeking to modify the existing custody provisions in the judgment of divorce, which was entered while he was deployed overseas with the United States Army, by awarding him primary physical custody of the parties’ child. We agree with the father that his return from deployment constituted a change in circumstances warranting review of the existing custody arrangement (see Family Ct Act § 651 [f] [3]). Contrary to the father’s contention, however, we conclude that Family Court did undertake such a review in light of the change in circumstances. The court held an evidentiary hearing, during which witnesses were called by both parties, conducted an in camera interview with the parties’ child and thereafter made a determination based upon the best interests of the child (cf. Matter of Hughes v Davis, 68 AD3d 1674 [2009]). Contrary to the further contention of the father, we conclude that the court’s determination that the best interests of the child are served by continuing primary physical custody with respondent mother is supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of McLeod v McLeod, 59 AD3d 1011 [2009]). Present — Scudder, EJ., Garni, Lindley, Sconiers and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Messimore v. Messimore, 89 A.D.3d 1547, 932 N.Y.2d 753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

89 A.D.3d 1547 (Messimore v. Messimore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DINGELDEY, JOSEPH v. DINGELDEY, ARLENE B.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
Dingeldey v. Dingeldey
93 A.D.3d 1325 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)