Messiah v. Whitley

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Messiah v. Whitley

582 So. 2d 1311, 1991 La. LEXIS 2047, 1991 WL 119823

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 28, 1991

DocketNo. 91-KD-1266

StatusPublished

This text of 582 So. 2d 1311 (Messiah v. Whitley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Messiah v. Whitley, 582 So. 2d 1311, 1991 La. LEXIS 2047, 1991 WL 119823 (La. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Messiah, Keith E.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 295-139; Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 295-139.

Denied.

LEMMON, J., would grant, being inclined to the belief that because of the appearance of impropriety, all recusal motions should be assigned by allotment and not by selection by the judge sought to be recused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Messiah, Keith E.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 295-139; Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 295-139.

Denied.

LEMMON, J., would grant, being inclined to the belief that because of the appearance of impropriety, all recusal motions should be assigned by allotment and not by selection by the judge sought to be recused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

582 So. 2d 1311, 1991 La. LEXIS 2047, 1991 WL 119823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/messiah-v-whitley-la-1991.