Messervy v. Messervy
64 S.E. 753, 82 S.C. 559, 1909 S.C. LEXIS 92
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This is an appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint, on the ground that *562 it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The ord^r of his Honor, the presiding Judge, is affirmed for the reasons therein stated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Messervy v. Messervy, 64 S.E. 753, 82 S.C. 559, 1909 S.C. LEXIS 92 (S.C. 1909).
64 S.E. 753 (Messervy v. Messervy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Russo v. Sutton
422 S.E.2d 750 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1992)
Lopez v. Waldrum
460 S.W.2d 61 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1970)
Lopez v. Waldrum Estate
460 S.W.2d 61 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1970)
Page v. Winter
126 S.E.2d 570 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1962)
Holloway v. Holloway Et Ux.
30 S.E.2d 596 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1944)
Austin v. Austin
100 So. 591 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1924)
Ryder v. Jefferson Hotel Company
113 S.E. 474 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1922)
Prosser v. Prosser
102 S.E. 78 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1920)
Coulter v. Hermitage Cotton Mills
98 S.E. 846 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1919)