Messer v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Messer v. State

167 S.W. 342, 74 Tex. Crim. 96, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 283

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 20, 1914·No. No. 3140.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law.

Court adjourned on 21st of February. The statement of facts and bills of exception were not filed until the 12th of March. The record does not contain an order authorizing the filing of the facts and the bills after the adjournment of the term. This being a misdemeanor, it was *97 necessary, and without the order allowing the twenty days after adjournment of the term these matters can not be considered. The record being in this condition, none of the matters set forth for revision can be considered.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law.

Court adjourned on 21st of February. The statement of facts and bills of exception were not filed until the 12th of March. The record does not contain an order authorizing the filing of the facts and the bills after the adjournment of the term. This being a misdemeanor, it was *97 necessary, and without the order allowing the twenty days after adjournment of the term these matters can not be considered. The record being in this condition, none of the matters set forth for revision can be considered.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Messer v. State, 167 S.W. 342, 74 Tex. Crim. 96, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 283 (Tex. 1914).

Pincite

167 S.W. 342 (Messer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related