Messer v. Monfried

243 A.D. 532

This text of 243 A.D. 532 (Messer v. Monfried) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Messer v. Monfried, 243 A.D. 532 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

In an action for an accounting, order granting motion of the corporate defendants to dismiss the amended complaint because it is insufficient as to them on the face thereof affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (Boag v. Thompson, 208 App. Div. 132; Koenigsberger v. Kahn, 228 id. 658.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boag v. Thompson
208 A.D. 132 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D. 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/messer-v-monfried-nyappdiv-1934.