Messer v. Hewitt
This text of 106 S.E.2d 61 (Messer v. Hewitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The defendant having admitted the execution of the note and pleaded want of consideration, a prima facie case was made out for the plaintiff, and the defendant assumed the burden of proof as to- the. plea. Ray v. Marett, 84 Ga. App. 86 (65 S. E. 2d 646); Morgan’s, Inc. v. Mons, 79 Ga. App. 525 (2) (54 S. E. 2d 498).
2. The evidence did not demand a. finding that the note was given for the suspension, suppression or discontinuance of a criminal prosecution. Therefore, the court was authorized to find against the plea and in favor of the plaintiff.
The court did not err in denying the motion for new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 S.E.2d 61, 98 Ga. App. 498, 1958 Ga. App. LEXIS 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/messer-v-hewitt-gactapp-1958.