Messer v. Hewitt

106 S.E.2d 61, 98 Ga. App. 498, 1958 Ga. App. LEXIS 621
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 30, 1958·No. 37348·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. The defendant having admitted the execution of the note and pleaded want of consideration, a prima facie case was made out for the plaintiff, and the defendant assumed the burden of proof as to- the. plea. Ray v. Marett, 84 Ga. App. 86 (65 S. E. 2d 646); Morgan’s, Inc. v. Mons, 79 Ga. App. 525 (2) (54 S. E. 2d 498).

2. The evidence did not demand a. finding that the note was given for the suspension, suppression or discontinuance of a criminal prosecution. Therefore, the court was authorized to find against the plea and in favor of the plaintiff.

The court did not err in denying the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian and Nichols, JJ., concur. *499 Troutman, Sams, Schroder & Lockerman, Tench C. Coxe, Robert L. Pennington, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Messer v. Hewitt, 106 S.E.2d 61, 98 Ga. App. 498, 1958 Ga. App. LEXIS 621 (Ga. Ct. App. 1958).

106 S.E.2d 61 (Messer v. Hewitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

John Deere Co. v. Lindsey Land Clearing Co.
178 S.E.2d 917 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
National Organic Corporation v. Southern Bag Corporation
140 S.E.2d 890 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)