Messer v. Hewitt

106 S.E.2d 61, 98 Ga. App. 498, 1958 Ga. App. LEXIS 621
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 30, 1958
Docket37348
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 106 S.E.2d 61 (Messer v. Hewitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Messer v. Hewitt, 106 S.E.2d 61, 98 Ga. App. 498, 1958 Ga. App. LEXIS 621 (Ga. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. The defendant having admitted the execution of the note and pleaded want of consideration, a prima facie case was made out for the plaintiff, and the defendant assumed the burden of proof as to- the. plea. Ray v. Marett, 84 Ga. App. 86 (65 S. E. 2d 646); Morgan’s, Inc. v. Mons, 79 Ga. App. 525 (2) (54 S. E. 2d 498).

2. The evidence did not demand a. finding that the note was given for the suspension, suppression or discontinuance of a criminal prosecution. Therefore, the court was authorized to find against the plea and in favor of the plaintiff.

The court did not err in denying the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian and Nichols, JJ., concur. *499 Troutman, Sams, Schroder & Lockerman, Tench C. Coxe, Robert L. Pennington, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John Deere Co. v. Lindsey Land Clearing Co.
178 S.E.2d 917 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)
National Organic Corporation v. Southern Bag Corporation
140 S.E.2d 890 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 S.E.2d 61, 98 Ga. App. 498, 1958 Ga. App. LEXIS 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/messer-v-hewitt-gactapp-1958.