Messenger v. Zinter

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Messenger v. Zinter

896 P.2d 1225, 135 Or. App. 200, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 927

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJune 21, 1995

DocketCV 94-0052; CA A84654

StatusPublished

This text of 896 P.2d 1225 (Messenger v. Zinter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Messenger v. Zinter, 896 P.2d 1225, 135 Or. App. 200, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 927 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this action for a constructive trust and an accounting, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the claims on the ground that they are barred by the Statute of Limitations. In the trial court, plaintiff filed no written response to the motion and did not appear at the hearing. On appeal she argues that the Statute of Limitations is inapplicable to her claims. We decline to consider the argument, because it was not raised in the trial court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this action for a constructive trust and an accounting, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the claims on the ground that they are barred by the Statute of Limitations. In the trial court, plaintiff filed no written response to the motion and did not appear at the hearing. On appeal she argues that the Statute of Limitations is inapplicable to her claims. We decline to consider the argument, because it was not raised in the trial court.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

896 P.2d 1225, 135 Or. App. 200, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/messenger-v-zinter-orctapp-1995.