Messenger v. Holmes
12 Wend. 203
Opinion
By the Court,
This case comes directly within the principle stated by Mr. Justice Marcy, in Bowman v. Ely, 2 Wendell, 250, as that which should govern in applications of this kind. When it is found by actual experiment that a fair trial, or, as in this case, no trial can be had in the county where the venue is laid, the motion, on the ground relied on in this case, will be granted ; but otherwise not.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Messenger v. Holmes, 12 Wend. 203 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1834).
12 Wend. 203 (Messenger v. Holmes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Snaith
8 N.Y.S. 668 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)
Taylor v. Gardiner
11 R.I. 182 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1875)
People v. Long Island Railroad
16 How. Pr. 106 (New York Supreme Court, 1858)
Cochecho Railroad v. Farrington
26 N.H. 428 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1853)
Murray v. New Jersey Railroad & Transportation Co.
23 N.J.L. 63 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1850)