Messall v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Messall v. State

1927 OK CR 264, 258 P. 1118, 38 Okla. Crim. 99, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 251

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 7, 1927

DocketNo. A-6223.

StatusPublished

This text of 1927 OK CR 264 (Messall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Messall v. State, 1927 OK CR 264, 258 P. 1118, 38 Okla. Crim. 99, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 251 (Okla. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, August Messall, was convicted in the district court of Logan county on an information charging that in said county, on the 18th day of July, 1925, he did feloniously attempt to ravish and carnally know one Martha Beuchaw, a female of the age of 17 years and not his wife, and his punishment *100 fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of three months. From the judgment entered in accordance with the verdict on September 21, 1925, an appeal was attempted to be taken by filing in this court on May 8, 1925, a petition in error with case-made. Counsel of record for plaintiff in error has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. The motion to dismiss is sustained, the appeal herein is dismissed, and cause remanded to the trial court, with direction to cause its judgment and sentence to be carried into execution. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, August Messall, was convicted in the district court of Logan county on an information charging that in said county, on the 18th day of July, 1925, he did feloniously attempt to ravish and carnally know one Martha Beuchaw, a female of the age of 17 years and not his wife, and his punishment *100 fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of three months. From the judgment entered in accordance with the verdict on September 21, 1925, an appeal was attempted to be taken by filing in this court on May 8, 1925, a petition in error with case-made. Counsel of record for plaintiff in error has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. The motion to dismiss is sustained, the appeal herein is dismissed, and cause remanded to the trial court, with direction to cause its judgment and sentence to be carried into execution. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1927 OK CR 264, 258 P. 1118, 38 Okla. Crim. 99, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/messall-v-state-oklacrimapp-1927.