Mesimeris v. United States

Second Circuit

Mesimeris v. United States

215 F. App'x 42

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJanuary 26, 2007

DocketNo. 06-1262-cv

StatusPublished

This text of 215 F. App'x 42 (Mesimeris v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mesimeris v. United States, 215 F. App'x 42 (2d Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

We assume that the parties and counsel are familiar with the facts, the procedural history, and the scope of the issues presented on appeal. Mesimeris argues that the district court’s conclusion on causation was clearly erroneous. But “we are not allowed to second-guess either the trial court’s credibility assessments or its choice between permissible competing inferences.” Ceraso v. Motiva Enterprises, LLC, 326 F.3d 303, 316 (2d Cir.2003) (citing Anderson v. Bessemer City, N.C., 470 U.S. 564, 573-74, 105 S.Ct. 1504, 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985)).

We have considered all of Mesimeris’s arguments and find them to be without merit.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

We assume that the parties and counsel are familiar with the facts, the procedural history, and the scope of the issues presented on appeal. Mesimeris argues that the district court’s conclusion on causation was clearly erroneous. But “we are not allowed to second-guess either the trial court’s credibility assessments or its choice between permissible competing inferences.” Ceraso v. Motiva Enterprises, LLC, 326 F.3d 303, 316 (2d Cir.2003) (citing Anderson v. Bessemer City, N.C., 470 U.S. 564, 573-74, 105 S.Ct. 1504, 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985)).

We have considered all of Mesimeris’s arguments and find them to be without merit.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 F. App'x 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mesimeris-v-united-states-ca2-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack