Mesidor v. State
This text of 521 So. 2d 333 (Mesidor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ghislaine MESIDOR, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Lloyd M. Routman, of Lloyd M. Routman, P.A., Miami, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Alfonso M. Saldana, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
GUNTHER, Judge.
We reverse the denial of a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. During the plea proceedings, the trial court failed to comply with § 90.606, Florida Statutes (1985), by failing to swear in the interpreter. Also, the court failed to determine the competency and bias of the interpreter.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
521 So. 2d 333, 1988 WL 18688, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mesidor-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.