Mesick v. Polk
70 N.E.2d 169, 296 N.Y. 673, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1248
This text of 70 N.E.2d 169 (Mesick v. Polk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mesick v. Polk, 70 N.E.2d 169, 296 N.Y. 673, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1248 (N.Y. 1946).
Opinion
Order reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts, and question certified answered in the negative, on the ground that there was no duty upon a mere vendor to warn the ultimate purchaser against exposure of the capsule to heat. No opinion.
Concur: Desmond, Thacher, Dye and Fuld, JJ. Dissenting: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis and Conway, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sparling v. Podzielinski
32 Misc. 2d 227 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Solazzo v. Occhino
4 Misc. 2d 630 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
70 N.E.2d 169, 296 N.Y. 673, 1946 N.Y. LEXIS 1248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mesick-v-polk-ny-1946.