Mesholam v. Mesholam

880 N.E.2d 874, 9 N.Y.3d 1011, 850 N.Y.S.2d 388, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 6
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mesholam v. Mesholam. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 N.Y.3d 24
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 8, 2008·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that it has been superceded by a subsequent motion for leave to appeal made by this appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mesholam v. Mesholam, 880 N.E.2d 874, 9 N.Y.3d 1011, 850 N.Y.S.2d 388, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 6 (N.Y. 2008).

880 N.E.2d 874 (Mesholam v. Mesholam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Matter of Julia Bb.
9 N.Y.3d 1011 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)