Meshberg v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Meshberg v. City of New York

88 A.D.2d 526, 450 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16658

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 11, 1982

StatusPublished

This text of 88 A.D.2d 526 (Meshberg v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meshberg v. City of New York, 88 A.D.2d 526, 450 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16658 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (L. Silverman, J.), entered on January 5,1981, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reversing the judgment in favor of plaintiff Irving Meshberg and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages only awarded to said plaintiff, without costs and without disbursements, and said judgment is otherwise affirmed, unless plaintiff Irving Mesh-berg, within 20 days after service upon him of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in his favor to $5,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff Irving Meshberg so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Ross, J. P., Markewich, Silverman, Bloom and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (L. Silverman, J.), entered on January 5,1981, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to the extent of reversing the judgment in favor of plaintiff Irving Meshberg and a new trial ordered on the issue of damages only awarded to said plaintiff, without costs and without disbursements, and said judgment is otherwise affirmed, unless plaintiff Irving Mesh-berg, within 20 days after service upon him of a copy of the order herein, with notice of entry, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the verdict in his favor to $5,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff Irving Meshberg so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. After review of the record, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Ross, J. P., Markewich, Silverman, Bloom and Asch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 A.D.2d 526, 450 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meshberg-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1982.