Mescall v. United States Department of Treasury

W.D. North Carolina

Mescall v. United States Department of Treasury

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina

DecidedMay 15, 2023

Docket3:23-cv-00078

StatusUnknown

This text of Mescall v. United States Department of Treasury (Mescall v. United States Department of Treasury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mescall v. United States Department of Treasury, (W.D.N.C. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:23-cv-00078-RJC-SCR

GERALD T. MESCALL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ORDER UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT ) OF TREASURY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________ )

THIS MATTER is before the Court on its review of the docket in this matter. Pro se Plaintiff seeks to proceed with this civil action without having to prepay costs associated with prosecuting the matter. The Court denied Plaintiff’s original, amended, and second amended motions to proceed in forma pauperis in this matter for the reasons stated in the Court’s Orders. [Docs. 3, 5, 7]. On April 13, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee within 21 days if he wished to proceed with this action. [Doc. 7 at 3]. On May 1, 2023, rather than pay the filing fee, Plaintiff appealed the Court’s Order requiring him to pay the filing fee. [Doc. 8]. Generally, “the filing of a timely and sufficient notice of appeal immediately transfers jurisdiction of all matters relating to the appeal from the district court to the court of appeals.” Hunter v. Town of Mocksville, 271 F.Supp.3d 787 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 21, 2017) (quoting Grand Jury Proceedings Under Seal v. United States, 947 F.2d 1188, 1190 (4th Cir. 1991)). “Nonetheless, a district court retains jurisdiction to act in three discreet circumstances: (1) when a matter is not related to the issue involved in the appeal; (2) when the order appealed is not appealable or is clearly frivolous; and (3) when a district court’s action would aid in the appeal.” In re Bryant, 175 B.R. 9, 11-12 (W.D. Va. Nov. 2, 1994). To aid in the appeal, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed: May 15, 2023

Robert J. Conrad, Jr. ed, United States District Judge “ae

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:23-cv-00078-RJC-SCR

GERALD T. MESCALL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ORDER UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT ) OF TREASURY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________ )

THIS MATTER is before the Court on its review of the docket in this matter. Pro se Plaintiff seeks to proceed with this civil action without having to prepay costs associated with prosecuting the matter. The Court denied Plaintiff’s original, amended, and second amended motions to proceed in forma pauperis in this matter for the reasons stated in the Court’s Orders. [Docs. 3, 5, 7]. On April 13, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee within 21 days if he wished to proceed with this action. [Doc. 7 at 3]. On May 1, 2023, rather than pay the filing fee, Plaintiff appealed the Court’s Order requiring him to pay the filing fee. [Doc. 8]. Generally, “the filing of a timely and sufficient notice of appeal immediately transfers jurisdiction of all matters relating to the appeal from the district court to the court of appeals.” Hunter v. Town of Mocksville, 271 F.Supp.3d 787 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 21, 2017) (quoting Grand Jury Proceedings Under Seal v. United States, 947 F.2d 1188, 1190 (4th Cir. 1991)). “Nonetheless, a district court retains jurisdiction to act in three discreet circumstances: (1) when a matter is not related to the issue involved in the appeal; (2) when the order appealed is not appealable or is clearly frivolous; and (3) when a district court’s action would aid in the appeal.” In re Bryant, 175 B.R. 9, 11-12 (W.D. Va. Nov. 2, 1994). To aid in the appeal, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed: May 15, 2023

Robert J. Conrad, Jr. ed, United States District Judge “ae

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Mescall v. United States Department of Treasury, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mescall-v-united-states-department-of-treasury-ncwd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack