Mesays v. Powell
This text of Mesays v. Powell (Mesays v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1127
KEMIL A. MESAYS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
COLIN POWELL, Secretary of the Department of State,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA- 03-3256-RDB)
Submitted: May 14, 2004 Decided: June 10, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kemil A. Mesays, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Kemil A. Mesays appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his employment discrimination complaint as untimely
filed, denying his motion for reconsideration, and denying his
request for a refund of the filing fee. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Mesays v. Powell, No. CA-03-
3256-RDB (D. Md. Nov. 24, 2003; Dec. 16, 2003; filed Jan. 9, 2004,
entered Jan. 22, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mesays v. Powell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mesays-v-powell-ca4-2004.