Mesays v. Powell
Opinion
Kemil A. Mesays appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his employment discrimination complaint as untimely filed, denying his motion for reconsideration, and denying his request for a refund of the filing fee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mesays v. Powell, No. CA-03-3256-RDB (D. Md. Nov. 24, 2003; Dec. 16, 2003; filed Jan. 9, 2004, entered Jan. 22, 2004). We dispense with oral argument [193] because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
100 F. App'x 192 (Mesays v. Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.