Mesays v. Hugel
This text of Mesays v. Hugel (Mesays v. Hugel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1723
KAMIL A. MESAYS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAVID H. HUGEL, ADMINISTRATOR MARYLAND MOTOR VEHICLE ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA- 04-1570-RDB)
Submitted: September 17, 2004 Decided: October 18, 2004
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kamil A. Mesays, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Kamil A. Mesays appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Mesays v. Hugel, No.
CA-04-1570-RDB (D. Md. May 28, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mesays v. Hugel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mesays-v-hugel-ca4-2004.