Mesays v. Hugel

Fourth Circuit

Mesays v. Hugel

110 F. App'x 369

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 18, 2004·No. No. 04-1723·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kamil A. Mesays appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mesays v. Hugel, No. CA-04-1570-RDB (D.Md. May 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Kamil A. Mesays appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mesays v. Hugel, No. CA-04-1570-RDB (D.Md. May 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Mesays v. Hugel, 110 F. App'x 369 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

110 F. App'x 369 (Mesays v. Hugel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related