Mesays v. Ashcroft
This text of Mesays v. Ashcroft (Mesays v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1213
KEMIL A. MESAYS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 02-3436-DKC)
Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 20, 2003
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kemil A. Mesays, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Kamil A. Mesays appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Mesays v. Ashcroft, No. CA-02-3436-DKC (D.
Md. filed Feb. 4, 2003 & entered Feb. 5, 2003). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mesays v. Ashcroft, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mesays-v-ashcroft-ca4-2003.