Mesays v. Ashcroft

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 20, 2003
Docket03-1213
StatusUnpublished

This text of Mesays v. Ashcroft (Mesays v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mesays v. Ashcroft, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1213

KEMIL A. MESAYS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 02-3436-DKC)

Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 20, 2003

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kemil A. Mesays, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Ariana Wright Arnold, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Kamil A. Mesays appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Mesays v. Ashcroft, No. CA-02-3436-DKC (D.

Md. filed Feb. 4, 2003 & entered Feb. 5, 2003). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mesays v. Ashcroft, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mesays-v-ashcroft-ca4-2003.