Mesarosh v. United States

352 U.S. 862, 1 L. Ed. 2d 72, 77 S. Ct. 8, 1956 U.S. LEXIS 387

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 10, 1956·No. No. 20·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the Government to remand the case to the District Court is denied.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with instructions to grant the defendants a new trial.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Burton, and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent, believing the Government’s motion to remand should be granted, and reserve the right to file an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion of the Government to remand the case to the District Court is denied.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with instructions to grant the defendants a new trial.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Burton, and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent, believing the Government’s motion to remand should be granted, and reserve the right to file an opinion.

Mesarosh v. United States, 352 U.S. 862, 1 L. Ed. 2d 72, 77 S. Ct. 8, 1956 U.S. LEXIS 387 (1956).

Pincite

352 U.S. 862 (Mesarosh v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Ricardo Sanders v. Vince Cullen

873 F.3d 778 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)

United States v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.

863 F.3d 125 (Second Circuit, 2017)

United States v. Saena Tech Corporation

140 F. Supp. 3d 11 (District of Columbia, 2015)

Cooperman v. Board of Education

577 F. Supp. 52 (D. New Jersey, 1983)

Cooperman v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF HILLSIDE TP.

577 F. Supp. 52 (D. New Jersey, 1983)

Opinion

Related