Mesaba-Cliffs Mining Co. v. Commissioner

Sixth Circuit

Mesaba-Cliffs Mining Co. v. Commissioner

177 F.2d 201

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 7, 1949

DocketNo. 10796

StatusPublished

This text of 177 F.2d 201 (Mesaba-Cliffs Mining Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mesaba-Cliffs Mining Co. v. Commissioner, 177 F.2d 201 (6th Cir. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the motion of the above named petitioner to recall the mandate heretofore issued and to revise the judgment of this court in the above cause, 174 F.2d 857, and it appearing that petitioner had conceded a deficiency in its excess profits tax for 1941 in the amount of $604.05 upon which a judgment' was entered in this court ordering such deficiency entered in petitioner’s excess profits tax for 1941 at the same time that the decision of the Tax Court, 10 T.C. 1010, was reversed; and it further appearing that pending the decision of this court on appeal, petitioner had paid such deficiency to the Collector of Internal Revenue; and it further appearing that the respondent consents to the granting of petitioner’s motion and to entry of judgment and issuance of mandate reversing the decision of the Tax Court and remanding the proceeding for entry of a decision in conformity with the opinion of this court; and the court being duly advised;

Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered that the mandate in the above cause be recalled, the decision of the Tax Court reversed and the cause remanded for the entry of a judgment in conformity with the prayer of the petitioner and the consent thereto of the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the motion of the above named petitioner to recall the mandate heretofore issued and to revise the judgment of this court in the above cause, 174 F.2d 857, and it appearing that petitioner had conceded a deficiency in its excess profits tax for 1941 in the amount of $604.05 upon which a judgment' was entered in this court ordering such deficiency entered in petitioner’s excess profits tax for 1941 at the same time that the decision of the Tax Court, 10 T.C. 1010, was reversed; and it further appearing that pending the decision of this court on appeal, petitioner had paid such deficiency to the Collector of Internal Revenue; and it further appearing that the respondent consents to the granting of petitioner’s motion and to entry of judgment and issuance of mandate reversing the decision of the Tax Court and remanding the proceeding for entry of a decision in conformity with the opinion of this court; and the court being duly advised;

Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered that the mandate in the above cause be recalled, the decision of the Tax Court reversed and the cause remanded for the entry of a judgment in conformity with the prayer of the petitioner and the consent thereto of the respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 F.2d 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mesaba-cliffs-mining-co-v-commissioner-ca6-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack