Merzweiler v. U.S. Office of Special Counsel
This text of 285 F. App'x 418 (Merzweiler v. U.S. Office of Special Counsel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
John A. Merzweiler appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendant in Merzweiler’s lawsuit, arising from the termination of his employment with the United Statés Postal Service. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Albano v. Norwest Fin. Haw., Inc., 244 F.3d 1061, 1063 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm.
We agree with the district court that the Office of Special Counsel’s decision finding no jurisdiction was correct for the reasons stated by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
285 F. App'x 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merzweiler-v-us-office-of-special-counsel-ca9-2008.