Mery v. Eginger
Opinion
Mery v Eginger (2018 NY Slip Op 04030)
| Mery v Eginger |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 04030 [31 NY3d 1068] |
| June 7, 2018 |
| Court of Appeals |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| As corrected through Wednesday, August 1, 2018 |
[*1]
| John P. Mery et al., Appellants, v Frank Eginger, Defendant, and Society of Friends Church, Also Known as the Poughkeepsie Monthly Meeting of the Religious Society of Friends and Another, Respondent. |
Decided June 7, 2018
Mery v Eginger, 149 AD3d 827, affirmed.
Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York City (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for appellants.
Jeffrey Samel & Partners, New York City (Robert G. Spevack of counsel), for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (149 AD3d 827 [2017]) and certified question not answered as unnecessary.
Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
31 N.Y.3d 1068 (Mery v. Eginger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.