Merwest Realty Corp. v. Prager

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Merwest Realty Corp. v. Prager

177 Misc. 2d 956, 679 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1998 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 477

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedAugust 5, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 177 Misc. 2d 956 (Merwest Realty Corp. v. Prager) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Merwest Realty Corp. v. Prager, 177 Misc. 2d 956, 679 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1998 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 477 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinions

[957]*957OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order entered August 15, 1997 affirmed, with $10 costs.

Adopting the analysis of Judge Marcy Friedman at the Civil Court (173 Misc 2d 868), we agree that the parties’ private agreement requiring the tenant to surrender possession of her rent-controlled apartment was void ab initio and cannot serve as a predicate for eviction under this holdover petition (see, NY City Rent and Rehabilitation Law [Administrative Code of City of NY] § 26-408 [a]; NY City Rent and Eviction Regulations [9 NYCRR] § 2200.15). We would add that the landlord cannot have relief from the rent control law or estop this long-term (30-year) tenant from asserting her statutory rights on the basis of any modest rent defaults attributed to tenant, or otherwise (see generally, Draper v Georgia Props., 230 AD2d 455, appeal dismissed 91 NY2d 849; Urban Assocs. v Hettinger, 177 AD2d 439, lv denied 79 NY2d 759).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[957]*957OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order entered August 15, 1997 affirmed, with $10 costs.

Adopting the analysis of Judge Marcy Friedman at the Civil Court (173 Misc 2d 868), we agree that the parties’ private agreement requiring the tenant to surrender possession of her rent-controlled apartment was void ab initio and cannot serve as a predicate for eviction under this holdover petition (see, NY City Rent and Rehabilitation Law [Administrative Code of City of NY] § 26-408 [a]; NY City Rent and Eviction Regulations [9 NYCRR] § 2200.15). We would add that the landlord cannot have relief from the rent control law or estop this long-term (30-year) tenant from asserting her statutory rights on the basis of any modest rent defaults attributed to tenant, or otherwise (see generally, Draper v Georgia Props., 230 AD2d 455, appeal dismissed 91 NY2d 849; Urban Assocs. v Hettinger, 177 AD2d 439, lv denied 79 NY2d 759).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 Misc. 2d 956, 679 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1998 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merwest-realty-corp-v-prager-nyappterm-1998.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack