Mervin Kenneth Arnold v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary

Ninth Circuit

Mervin Kenneth Arnold v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary

447 F.2d 988

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 23, 1971

Docket71-1951

StatusPublished

This text of 447 F.2d 988 (Mervin Kenneth Arnold v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mervin Kenneth Arnold v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, 447 F.2d 988 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mervin Kenneth Arnold, an Oregon State prisoner, appeals from a judgment of the District Court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus following a hearing. None of his assignments of error has merit.

The record contains substantial evidence to support the District Court’s finding that Arnold was mentally competent at the time he entered his plea of guilty. Likewise, there was substantial evidence to support the District Judge’s finding that he was afforded the effective assistance of counsel in entering his plea. And, finally, we agree with the District Court that Arnold understood the nature of the charges and the consequences of his guilty plea.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Mervin Kenneth Arnold, an Oregon State prisoner, appeals from a judgment of the District Court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus following a hearing. None of his assignments of error has merit.

The record contains substantial evidence to support the District Court’s finding that Arnold was mentally competent at the time he entered his plea of guilty. Likewise, there was substantial evidence to support the District Judge’s finding that he was afforded the effective assistance of counsel in entering his plea. And, finally, we agree with the District Court that Arnold understood the nature of the charges and the consequences of his guilty plea.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

447 F.2d 988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mervin-kenneth-arnold-v-hoyt-c-cupp-superintendent-oregon-state-ca9-1971.