Mervin Carlos McKinney and v. People of the State of California, Louis S. Nelson
This text of 427 F.2d 160 (Mervin Carlos McKinney and v. People of the State of California, Louis S. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The order of the district court dismissing plaintiff’s complaint is affirmed.
The fact that McKinney disagrees with the prison doctors’ diagnosis of his ills is not a sufficient basis for a civil rights action.
Further, we are of the opinion that events alleged here concerning one prison riot are not cognizable under applicable federal statutes.
We find no error in the district court’s ruling on McKinney’s various motions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
427 F.2d 160, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mervin-carlos-mckinney-and-v-people-of-the-state-of-california-louis-s-ca9-1970.