Mertz v. de Landa
260 A.D. 1034
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 16, 1940
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished
This text of 260 A.D. 1034 (Mertz v. de Landa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mertz v. de Landa, 260 A.D. 1034 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).
Opinion
Order denying the defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
260 A.D. 1034, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mertz-v-de-landa-nyappdiv-1940.