Mertens v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance

6 S.E.2d 496, 216 N.C. 741
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 3, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 6 S.E.2d 496 (Mertens v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mertens v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance, 6 S.E.2d 496, 216 N.C. 741 (N.C. 1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Under the terms of the policy, the disability for which claim is made must have been sustained before the insured became sixty-five years of age. He reached that age 23 July, 1934. He alleged total and permanent disability prior to that date. The evidence disclosed that he worked continuously as a bookkeeper at a salary of $1,800 per year until May, 1937, though enfeebled by physical infirmity and lessening eyesight.

The ruling of the court below in sustaining the motion for nonsuit must be upheld and the judgment dismissing the action

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fair v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
100 S.E.2d 373 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
Ireland v. . Insurance Co.
38 S.E.2d 206 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)
Ireland v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York
226 N.C. 349 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)
Maroney v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
9 S.E.2d 872 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 S.E.2d 496, 216 N.C. 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mertens-v-provident-mutual-life-insurance-nc-1940.