Mertens v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance
This text of 6 S.E.2d 496 (Mertens v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the terms of the policy, the disability for which claim is made must have been sustained before the insured became sixty-five years of age. He reached that age 23 July, 1934. He alleged total and permanent disability prior to that date. The evidence disclosed that he worked continuously as a bookkeeper at a salary of $1,800 per year until May, 1937, though enfeebled by physical infirmity and lessening eyesight.
The ruling of the court below in sustaining the motion for nonsuit must be upheld and the judgment dismissing the action
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 S.E.2d 496, 216 N.C. 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mertens-v-provident-mutual-life-insurance-nc-1940.