Mertens v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance

6 S.E.2d 496, 216 N.C. 741
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 3, 1940·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Under the terms of the policy, the disability for which claim is made must have been sustained before the insured became sixty-five years of age. He reached that age 23 July, 1934. He alleged total and permanent disability prior to that date. The evidence disclosed that he worked continuously as a bookkeeper at a salary of $1,800 per year until May, 1937, though enfeebled by physical infirmity and lessening eyesight.

The ruling of the court below in sustaining the motion for nonsuit must be upheld and the judgment dismissing the action

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mertens v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance, 6 S.E.2d 496, 216 N.C. 741 (N.C. 1940).

6 S.E.2d 496 (Mertens v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fair v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
100 S.E.2d 373 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1957)
Ireland v. . Insurance Co.
38 S.E.2d 206 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)
Ireland v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York
226 N.C. 349 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)
Maroney v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
9 S.E.2d 872 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1940)