Merritt v. United States
58 Ct. Cl. 371, 1923 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 323, 1923 WL 2151
Opinion
[372] MEMORANDUM
1. The facts averred do not show a contract, express or implied, between plaintiff and the United States.
2. It appears that the Government paid the prime contractor the price for the goods delivered, and if the prime contractor imposed upon plaintiff, that fact does not give a cause of action against the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Merritt v. United States, 58 Ct. Cl. 371, 1923 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 323, 1923 WL 2151 (cc 1923).
58 Ct. Cl. 371 (Merritt v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hughes Transp., Inc. v. United States
121 F. Supp. 212 (Court of Claims, 1954)