Merritt v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Merritt v. State

552 S.W.3d 718

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 24, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105790

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 552 S.W.3d 718 (Merritt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Merritt v. State, 552 S.W.3d 718 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Sandra Merritt appeals from the judgment of the circuit court denying her Rule 29.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Sandra Merritt appeals from the judgment of the circuit court denying her Rule 29.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

552 S.W.3d 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merritt-v-state-moctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack