Merritt v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Merritt v. State

262 S.W.3d 676, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1230, 2008 WL 4133866

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Merritt v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1223 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 9, 2008·No. ED 90314·Published

Opinion

*677 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Merritt appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*677 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Merritt appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Merritt v. State, 262 S.W.3d 676, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1230, 2008 WL 4133866 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

262 S.W.3d 676 (Merritt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.