Merritt v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Merritt v. State

262 S.W.3d 676, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1230, 2008 WL 4133866

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 9, 2008

DocketED 90314

StatusPublished

This text of 262 S.W.3d 676 (Merritt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Merritt v. State, 262 S.W.3d 676, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1230, 2008 WL 4133866 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

*677 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Merritt appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*677 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Merritt appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 S.W.3d 676, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1230, 2008 WL 4133866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merritt-v-state-moctapp-2008.