Merritt v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Merritt v. State

67 S.E. 797, 134 Ga. 263, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 161

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMarch 19, 1910

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 67 S.E. 797 (Merritt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Merritt v. State, 67 S.E. 797, 134 Ga. 263, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 161 (Ga. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

The evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to support the verdict. Certain grounds of the motion for new trial, one complaining of a ruling by the judge allowing a witness to testify who had remained in court and heard some of the otljer witnesses testify after the rule had been invoked for the sequestration of witnesses, and the others complaining of the charge to the jury, wore not of such character as to require the grant of a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J.. absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

The evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to support the verdict. Certain grounds of the motion for new trial, one complaining of a ruling by the judge allowing a witness to testify who had remained in court and heard some of the otljer witnesses testify after the rule had been invoked for the sequestration of witnesses, and the others complaining of the charge to the jury, wore not of such character as to require the grant of a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, C. J.. absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 S.E. 797, 134 Ga. 263, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merritt-v-state-ga-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack