Merritt v. Plumbing NYC, Inc.

2024 NY Slip Op 30321(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, Kings County
DecidedJanuary 25, 2024
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 30321(U) (Merritt v. Plumbing NYC, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, Kings County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merritt v. Plumbing NYC, Inc., 2024 NY Slip Op 30321(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2024).

Opinion

Merritt v Plumbing NYC, Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 30321(U) January 25, 2024 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 518582/2022 Judge: Robin K. Sheares Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 01/29/2024 01:22 PM INDEX NO. 518582/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 85 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/29/2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------X MASSIAH MERRITT,

Plaintiff: DECISION & ORDER

-against- Index No.: 5185 82/2022

PLUMBING NYC, INC. d/b/a PLUMBING WORKS INC., Motion Sequence No. 4 ~ DIVINE INDUSTRIES INC., TRISTATE PLUMBING & HEATING, INC., RRP PLUMBING CORP., THE BROOKLYN UNION GAS COMPANY d/b/a NATIONAL GRID NY and THE HALLEN CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.,

Defendants. ----------------------------------------------------------------------X

Recitation, as required by CPLR §2219(a), of the papers considered in the review of this Motion:

Papers NYSECF Document No.

Sequence 1Vo. 4

Notice of Motion and Atlidavits/Affirmations and Annexed 59,60,67,68 Exhibits 61-66

Affirrnation/Aflidavit of Service 69

Affidavit/Affirmation in Opposition to Motion 70

Affidavit/Affirmation in Opposition to Motion 78

SHEARES, R.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries he allegedly

sustained on June 29, 2019, on Classon Avenue between Lafayette Avenue and Clifton Place,

Brooklyn, New York.

It has. been alleged that on the date in question, Plaintiff was riding a scooter within the

roadway of Classon Avenue between Lafayette A venue and Clifton Place when his scooter struck

an uneven street surface that caused him to fall and sustain injuries. Plaintiff brought the present

action alleging that one or more of the named defendants caused or created the uneven street

1 of 4 [* 1] FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 01/29/2024 01:22 PM INDEX NO. 518582/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 85 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/29/2024

surface, and/or had a duty to warn the plaintiff of the purported street defect and protect them from

that defect.

On September 28, 2023, Defendant BROOKLYN UNION GAS COMPANY d/b/a

NATIONAL GRID NY ("National Grid") filed a motion for summary judgment seeking the

dismissal of all claims and crossclaims against them as a matter of law (Motion Sequence No. 4,

NYSCEF DOC. NO. 59, et seq). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is hereby granted in

its entirety.

Defendant THE HALLEN CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. ("Hallen") is a contractor that

performs work for National Grid. On May 12, 2023, Hallen filed a motion for summary judgment

in this matter (Motion Sequence No. 1, NYSCEF DOC. N0.15 et seq): Hallen's motion was

supported by the affidavit of their Coordinator of Claims and Benefits, Ashley Ruiz iliYSCEF

DOC. NO. 21) and by copies ofHallen's records. In her affidavit, Ms. Ruiz noted that a review of.

their records showed that Hallen had performed work on the sidewalk of Classon St., which work

had been requested by and performed on the behalf of National Grid, but not in the roadway. As

Plaintiff alleges that his accident took place in the roadway rather than on the sidewalk, Hallen

asserted that they did not cause, create, or contribute to the condition in the roadway that is claimed

to have caused the plaintiffs accident.

On July 6, 2023, this court issued an order granting Hallen's motion and dismissing all

claims and crossclaims against them, finding explicitly that:

HALLEN has established a prima facie case of entitlement to the dismissal of all claims and cross claims against them in this action, in that they performed no work in the area alleged by the plaintiff to be the site of the subject accident, whether on behalf of THE BROOKLYN UNION GAS COMP ANY and/or in any other capacity [and] that there is no triable issue of fact as to whether it was performing any such work in the subject area, and no evidence has been proffered to refute defendant's contention.

2 of 4 [* 2] FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 01/29/2024 01:22 PM INDEX NO. 518582/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 85 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/29/2024

{NYSCEF DOC. NO. 30). The order was served with notice of entry by Hallen on all parties on

July 11, 2023 (NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31).

The motion for summary judgment filed by National Grid is supported by, among other . ' . things, the affidavit of their records searcher, Walter Stone, supported by records maintained by

National Grid iliYSCEF DOC. NO. 65). Mr. Stone conducted a search of National Grid's records

for any and all work performed on or in the vicinity of Classon Avenue between Lafayette A venue

and Clifton Place for the two years up to and including June 29, 2019. Based on that search Mr.

Stone concluded that:

1. No work was performed by National Grid employees on or in the vicinity of Classon Avenµe between Lafayette Avenue and Clifton Place for the two years up to and including June 29, 2019. All such work was instead performed by contractor Hallen, retained by National Grid for that purpose.

2. As indicated in the affidavit of Hallen employee Ashley Ruiz, all work done on behalf of National Grid on Classon Avenue between Lafayette Avenue and Clifton Place for the two years up to and including June 29, 2019, was performed in the street; no work was done by or on behalf of Natioal Grid in the roadway in that area.

No evidence has been presented by any party to contradict any of the above factual

assertions.

Mr. Stone's affidavit and the records on which that affidavit was based establish that Hallen

was the only entity to perform any work on behalf of National Grid on the block of.Classon Avenue

where the plaintiffs accident is alleged to have occurred. As Hallen's work did not cause the

plaintiffs accident, it has been established as a matter of law that no work performed by or on

behalf of National Grid was a proximate cause of the injuries sustained by Mr. Merrjtt. See, e.g., 1 Ahrorgulova v. Mann; 144 A.D.3d 953, 955,.42 N.Y.S.3d 203, 205 (2d Dept, 2016); Matter of

Chung Li, 1?5 A.D.3d 1105, 1106, 87 N.Y.S.3d 316, 318 (2d Dept, 2018); RPG Consulting, Inc.

v. Zormati, 82 A.D.3d 739,740,917 N.Y.S.2d 897 (2d Dept., 2011); Martin v. City ofCohoes, 37

3 of 4 [* 3] FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 01/29/2024 01:22 PM INDEX NO. 518582/2022 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 85 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/29/2024

N.Y.2d 162, 165,332 N.E.2d 867, 869 (1975). Thus, all claims ~nd crossclaims against National

Grid must be and hereby are hereby dismissed as a matter oflaw.

If in the course of the litigation it is determined that at or about the time of the Plaintiffs

accident, National Grid performed or caused to be performed excavation or paving work on the

roadway of Classon Avenue between Lafayette Avenue and Clifton Place, in the location where

the plaintiff alleges that their accident occurred, a party or parties may seek to renew Motion

Sequence No. 4 pursuant to the provisions of CPLR §2221 (e). Should a motion to renew be made,

a full and co'mplete copy of the motion papers must be served by mail or delivery on the office of

Morris Duffy Alonso Faley & Pitcoff as counsel to National Grid simultaneously with its filing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ahrorgulova v. Mann
2016 NY Slip Op 7914 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Martin v. City of Cohoes
332 N.E.2d 867 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
RPG Consulting, Inc. v. Zormati
82 A.D.3d 739 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 30321(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merritt-v-plumbing-nyc-inc-nysupctkings-2024.