Merritt v. Park

Supreme Court

Merritt v. Park

108 U.S. 109, 2 S. Ct. 310, 27 L. Ed. 669, 1883 U.S. LEXIS 1011

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 19, 1883

Docket711

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 108 U.S. 109 (Merritt v. Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Merritt v. Park, 108 U.S. 109, 2 S. Ct. 310, 27 L. Ed. 669, 1883 U.S. LEXIS 1011 (1883).

Pincite

Opinion

Me. Justice Blatchford

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit to recover back duties exacted by the plaintiff in error, as collector of the port of New York, on glass bottles imported in March, 1879, from London. The bottles contained beer, and the defendant below exacted a specific* duty of 35 cents a gallon on the beer, .and also a duty of 30 per cent, ad valorem on the' bottles. The bottles were the ordinary ale bottles of commerce. The circuit court directed a verdict for the plaintiffs, and they had a judgment, to review which the collector brought this’writ of error.

The question involved is the same, and arose under the same statutory provisions, as in the case of Schmidt v. Badger, 107 U. S. 85. It ivas there held that such duty on the bottles, in addition to such duty on the beer and ale contained in them, was a laAvful duty. That decision governs the present case, and the judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the case is remanded to that court, Avith directions to grant a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Me. Justice Blatchford

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit to recover back duties exacted by the plaintiff in error, as collector of the port of New York, on glass bottles imported in March, 1879, from London. The bottles contained beer, and the defendant below exacted a specific* duty of 35 cents a gallon on the beer, .and also a duty of 30 per cent, ad valorem on the' bottles. The bottles were the ordinary ale bottles of commerce. The circuit court directed a verdict for the plaintiffs, and they had a judgment, to review which the collector brought this’writ of error.

The question involved is the same, and arose under the same statutory provisions, as in the case of Schmidt v. Badger, 107 U. S. 85. It ivas there held that such duty on the bottles, in addition to such duty on the beer and ale contained in them, was a laAvful duty. That decision governs the present case, and the judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the case is remanded to that court, Avith directions to grant a new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 U.S. 109, 2 S. Ct. 310, 27 L. Ed. 669, 1883 U.S. LEXIS 1011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merritt-v-park-scotus-1883.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack