Merritt v. Newman
This text of 267 A.D. 855 (Merritt v. Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed on the law, with costs, and verdict reinstated. Memorandum: On the proofs disclosed by the record, the issues of defendant Helen Newman’s negligence and plaintiff’s contributory negligence were for the jury and, in our opinion, the findings in plaintiff’s favor are not against the weight of evidence. Erickson v. Grobsmith (263 N. Y. 606) is distinguishable upon its facts and does not support respondents’ contention that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. All concur. (The order sets aside the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff in an automobile negligence action, and grants a new trial.) Present — Cunningham, P. J., Taylor, Harris, McCurn and Larldn, JJ. [See post, p. 1034.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
267 A.D. 855, 46 N.Y.S.2d 34, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merritt-v-newman-nyappdiv-1944.