Merritt v. New York City Transit Authority

Second Circuit

Merritt v. New York City Transit Authority

354 F. App'x 481

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 25, 2009

DocketNo. 08-5349-cv

StatusPublished

This text of 354 F. App'x 481 (Merritt v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Merritt v. New York City Transit Authority, 354 F. App'x 481 (2d Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff Denise M. Merritt, ‘pro se, brought claims against both defendants under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., alleging wrongful termination, disparate treatment, and retaliation. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Mauskopf, J.) granted summary judgment in favor of defendants. Merritt v. New York City Transit Auth., No. 06 Civ. 5548, 2008 WL 4508258 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2008). We presume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.

Having conducted a de novo review of the record, we find each of plaintiffs arguments to be without merit and affirm for substantially similar reasons as those stated by the district court. Accordingly, the order of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff Denise M. Merritt, ‘pro se, brought claims against both defendants under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., alleging wrongful termination, disparate treatment, and retaliation. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Mauskopf, J.) granted summary judgment in favor of defendants. Merritt v. New York City Transit Auth., No. 06 Civ. 5548, 2008 WL 4508258 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2008). We presume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.

Having conducted a de novo review of the record, we find each of plaintiffs arguments to be without merit and affirm for substantially similar reasons as those stated by the district court. Accordingly, the order of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

354 F. App'x 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merritt-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-ca2-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack