Merritt v. Merritt

19 Jones & S. 540
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided March 2, 1885·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The facts show that the discretion of the court below was duly exercised. The fact that the plaintiff had means of her own should be considered and have due weight, especially as to the amount, but of itself it does not require that no alimony should be given. Order affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Merritt v. Merritt, 19 Jones & S. 540 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1885).

19 Jones & S. 540 (Merritt v. Merritt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.