Merritt v. Lefevre & Zeliff

19 Johns. 265
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1822
StatusPublished

This text of 19 Johns. 265 (Merritt v. Lefevre & Zeliff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merritt v. Lefevre & Zeliff, 19 Johns. 265 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1822).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are of opinion that the words, “ as in other cases on judgments in the said Court of Common Pleas,” in the twentieth section of the act, apply only to the manner of issuing the execution, not to the judgment or amount to be recovered. The appellee is entitled to costs in all cases where there is a verdict in his favour.

Rule granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Johns. 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merritt-v-lefevre-zeliff-nysupct-1822.