Merritt v. Jackson

2 Dem. Sur. 214
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1883
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Dem. Sur. 214 (Merritt v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Merritt v. Jackson, 2 Dem. Sur. 214 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1883).

Opinion

The Surrogate.

I have been referred tono reported case, which decides how far orders and decrees of a Surrogate’s court are binding upon the representatives of one who, having been a party to the proceedings, has died during their pendency, in cases where such representatives have not themselves subsequently been made parties.

But it seems eminently proper, even if it is not essential, that one who is the acknowledged representative of a party deceased, and who asks as such to intervene, should be allowed so to do. That course is sanctioned by Lafferty v. Lafferty (5 Redf., 326); Van Alen v. Hewins (5 Hun, 44); and cases cited.

Application granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lafferty v. Lafferty
5 Redf. 326 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Dem. Sur. 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merritt-v-jackson-nysurct-1883.