Merriman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Merriman v. State

481 S.W.3d 56, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1219, 2015 WL 7450186

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 24, 2015·No. No. ED 102569·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeremy Merriman appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion [57] without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous, and no error of law appears. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeremy Merriman appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion [57] without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous, and no error of law appears. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Merriman v. State, 481 S.W.3d 56, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1219, 2015 WL 7450186 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

481 S.W.3d 56 (Merriman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.