Merriman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Merriman v. State

481 S.W.3d 56, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1219, 2015 WL 7450186

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 24, 2015

DocketNo. ED 102569

StatusPublished

This text of 481 S.W.3d 56 (Merriman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Merriman v. State, 481 S.W.3d 56, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1219, 2015 WL 7450186 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeremy Merriman appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion [57]*57without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous, and no error of law appears. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeremy Merriman appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion [57]*57without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous, and no error of law appears. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

481 S.W.3d 56, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1219, 2015 WL 7450186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merriman-v-state-moctapp-2015.