Merriman v. State
This text of 573 So. 2d 1143 (Merriman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Merriman, A.T.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Bossier, 26th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 68814.
Denied. Inquiries made in the Second Circuit Court of Appeal establish as factually erroneous relator’s claim that his counsel brought some issues complaining of the denial of the motion to suppress before the Second Circuit. The application to which relator refers in his petition, 22324-KW, was filed by attorneys who represent a co-defendant, Joseph Reed, and not by relator’s counsel. Docket No. 22324-KW was submitted on behalf of that accused (Joseph Reed) only. Relator should seek review of his claims in the Second Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
573 So. 2d 1143, 1991 La. LEXIS 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/merriman-v-state-la-1991.